Commercial Arbitration | California | Collaborative Contributor

This landmark arbitration involved a high-value Bitcoin partnership dispute in California under the purview of a senior American Arbitration Association (AAA) Arbitrator. The matter stemmed from the dissolution of a technology venture whose primary asset—a jointly held digital currency portfolio—had multiplied dramatically in value. What began as a straightforward claim of unequal profit distribution evolved into a sophisticated examination of fiduciary duty, partnership law, and the rapidly developing legal framework surrounding digital assets.

Complexities and Legal Nuances
Central issues included allegations of unilateral liquidation, opaque record-keeping, and undisclosed transfers of cryptocurrency across multiple wallets during periods of extreme market volatility. The case required deep analysis of blockchain transactions, valuation methodology, and the ethical obligations of partners managing non-traditional, decentralized assets. Layered within the legal questions were human concerns—erosion of trust, perceived betrayal, and the struggle to define fairness in an arena where regulatory guidance remains fluid and incomplete.

Role and Collaborative Function
Working in tandem with the presiding Arbitrator, I served as a collaborative contributor—refining, restructuring, and strengthening key portions of the arbitral opinion and analytical framework. My work focused on ensuring clarity, precision, and legal soundness while integrating the nuanced realities of blockchain technology into established partnership doctrine. I applied mediation insight to reframe positional arguments into interest-based reasoning and to surface underlying motivations obscured by technical jargon and emotional defensiveness.

Strategic and Analytical Contributions
> My contributions centered on transforming complexity into coherence:

> Translating blockchain evidence into accessible legal findings.

> Strengthening the logical structure of the arbitral reasoning to withstand appellate scrutiny.

> Bridging gaps between traditional fiduciary principles and emerging standards in digital finance.

> Clarifying areas where existing law lagged behind technological practice, thereby future-proofing the analytical integrity of the award.

Impact and Takeaways
This matter exemplified the convergence of commercial law, technology, and human behavior—highlighting the need for adaptable reasoning in an era of decentralized finance. Through disciplined analysis and empathic collaboration, I helped restore clarity to an otherwise chaotic intersection of innovation and accountability. The resulting award reflected not only legal precision but a deep awareness of the human and ethical dynamics that define modern commercial partnerships.

Core Competencies:
Commercial Arbitration · Digital Asset & Blockchain Disputes · Partnership Law & Fiduciary Duty · Legal Drafting & Analytical Refinement · Forensic Transaction Analysis · Emerging Financial Regulation · Ethical Stewardship in Technology Ventures · Strategic Mediation Support · Interest-Based Reframing · Complex Case Management

Private Commercial Mediation | California

This protracted and high-profile case centered on the hostile takeover of a prestigious law firm by one of its senior partners, unfolding over several years of litigation and internal arbitration. What began as a disagreement over governance and firm direction evolved into a dense web of fiduciary claims, partnership obligations, insurance coverage disputes, and professional ethics questions—each issue amplified by fractured communication and the erosion of trust among former colleagues.

At its core, the matter revealed the fragile balance between power, legacy, and loyalty within elite professional partnerships.

The dynamics demanded a rare combination of legal sophistication, business acumen, and emotional intelligence—a nuanced understanding of how leadership transitions, financial exposure, and internal politics converge in high-value professional organizations. Recurring issues included the valuation of goodwill, partner compensation structures, client ownership, reputational harm, and the ethics of succession, each requiring delicate reframing and strategic negotiation sequencing to restore communication and explore durable resolution.

Working alongside a seasoned distinguished neutral , I served as both strategist and co-mediator, guiding confidential mediation. Our collaboration required a fusion of analytical precision and empathic insight—approaching each claim, defense, and allegation not as isolated legal positions, but as expressions of deeper motivations, ambitions, and fears. Subsequently, we deconstructed entrenched narratives, clarified hidden interests beneath adversarial postures, and gradually rebuilt the scaffolding of trust necessary for forward movement.

Throughout the process, I applied a professional business pragmatism grounded in human understanding—using structured negotiation frameworks, reflective inquiry, and evaluative analysis to illuminate pathways toward resolution. My role was to dissect complexity while preserving dignity, translating chaos into coherence, reestablishing credibility among fractured stakeholders, and restoring the capacity for reasoned decision-making.

Ultimately, this case exemplified the caliber of commercial and interpersonal sophistication entrusted to my practice—where law, leadership, and human psychology intersect, and where the mediator’s steady presence can transform the trajectory of even the most entrenched disputes.

Core Competencies:
Commercial Mediation · Law-Firm Governance Disputes · Partnership & Fiduciary Claims · Insurance Coverage & Ethics · Complex Case Management · Strategic Negotiation Sequencing · Power & Leadership Dynamics · Business Valuation & Goodwill Assessment · Reflective Inquiry & Reframing · Multi-Party Facilitation · Emotional Intelligence in Professional Cultures

Employment Mediation | California | Lead Mediator

This matter involved a senior human resources executive at one of the world’s largest multinational retailers who brought forth claims of wrongful termination, discrimination, and retaliation following his dismissal for alleged misconduct. Originating as a federal employment action, the case was diverted to private mediation prior to trial at the request of counsel and the presiding judge, given its complexity, high monetary exposure, and the reputational stakes for all parties involved.

As Lead Mediator, I was engaged to conduct a comprehensive, pre-litigation resolution process addressing the intertwined legal, procedural, and interpersonal dimensions of the dispute. The matter presented a multi-layered intersection of employment law, corporate ethics, and executive accountability within a global enterprise environment—requiring a blend of evaluative, facilitative, and transformative mediation techniques.

The claimant, a long-tenured executive with regional management authority, alleged retaliatory discharge and systemic bias. The corporation maintained that termination was predicated upon substantiated findings of gross misconduct and repeated policy violations, supported by multiple internal investigations and compliance audits. The evidentiary record revealed divergent narratives concerning workplace conduct, equity, and due process, each underscored by complex organizational hierarchies and internal power dynamics.

The mediation convened multiple stakeholders—corporate counsel, external defense attorneys, plaintiff’s counsel, and executive leadership representatives—each balancing the demands of confidentiality, fiduciary duty, and public image. I employed a phased negotiation architecture incorporating early neutral evaluation, sequential caucusing, and controlled information exchange to promote strategic de-escalation and analytical clarity. The process drew upon federal employment law precedents, while integrating interest-based negotiation and risk-adjusted settlement modeling.

Throughout, I maintained an evaluative posture tempered with empathy, probing not only the legal merits but the underlying emotional and reputational currents that obstructed resolution. The mediation advanced through iterative analysis of liability exposure, credibility assessment, and the comparative advantages of pre-trial settlement.

Ultimately, the process produced substantive progress toward resolution and institutional learning, reaffirming the value of early private mediation in federal employment matters of national scale. The case stands as an exemplar of high-level, trust-dependent dispute resolution, where law, leadership psychology, and organizational ethics intersect within a framework of procedural integrity and discretion.

Core Competencies:
Federal Employment Mediation · Complex Case Management · Discrimination & Retaliation Claims · Corporate Ethics & Compliance · High-Conflict Negotiation · Risk Assessment & Early Neutral Evaluation · Legal-Ethical Interface · Reputation Management · Multi-Party Facilitation · Emotional Intelligence in Leadership Disputes

Description Coming Soon

Description Coming Soon

Description Coming Soon

Peacebuilding Initiative at Kakuma Refugee Camp In partnership with the Weinstein International Foundation, Swisspeace, and Beekee E-Learning Technology

Set against the extraordinary backdrop of the Kakuma Refugee Camp in northwestern Kenya, I had the honor of designing and delivering a peacebuilding initiative that brought mediation and communication training to one of the most complex humanitarian environments in the world.

Established in 1992, Kakuma is home to more than 200,000 refugees representing over twenty nations—including South Sudan, Somalia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, and Burundi. Within this remarkable mosaic of cultures, languages, and histories of displacement, conflict often arises not from hostility, but from the daily struggle for dignity, identity, and limited resources.

Recognizing this reality, I created a three-module training series to equip civil society leaders and community representatives with practical tools for constructive dialogue, conflict transformation, and social cohesion. Developed collaboratively with global peacebuilding partners, the program was designed to bridge academic insight with grassroots application—translating modern mediation foundations into the realities of field-based conflict.

The Training Modules

Module 1 – Conflict and Communication
An exploration of both the psychological and structural roots of conflict, focusing on how communication can serve as a tool for transformation rather than escalation.

Module 2 – Effective Verbal Communication
Training in clarity, empathy, and credibility during high-stress discussions—helping leaders rebuild trust and navigate polarized community issues.

Module 3 – Effective Non-Verbal Communication
A study of the silent dimensions of understanding—body language, tone, and cultural nuance—tailored to the diverse African social contexts within Kakuma.

Lasting Impact

Through interactive workshops, recorded lectures, and scenario-based simulations, participants developed both a theoretical grounding and practical skills in mediation, dialogue, and resilience building. This initiative became a living example of peacebuilding in action—where communication itself becomes a vehicle for reconciliation, empowerment, and hope.

Working alongside my colleague and collaboration peer, Victor Baba, I was reminded that peace is never imposed from the outside; it grows from within communities. The experience affirmed my belief in the enduring power of dialogue to replace division with understanding and to restore humanity where it is most urgently needed.

Skills: Conflict Resolution · Transformative Mediation · Peacebuilding · Interest-Based Negotiation · International Development · Cross-Cultural Communication

Core Competencies:
Peacebuilding and Mediation Design · Cross-Cultural Communication · Conflict Transformation · Humanitarian Leadership Development · Dialogue Facilitation · Community Resilience Building · Trauma-Informed Practice · International Collaboration · Experiential Learning Design · Ethical and Sustainable Peace Processes

Collaboratively developed with contributions from David Seibel, Harvard Program on Negotiation Instructor and Founder of Insight Collaborative (Boston)

In 2023, I had the privilege of presenting this program to the California Association of Anger Management Providers and several state bar associations. Developed in collaboration with David Seibel of Harvard’s Program on Negotiation, the presentation bridges neuroscience, psychology, and mediation practice to explore how the human brain responds under conflict—and how skilled neutrals can help parties move from emotional reactivity to rational problem-solving.

Drawing from my master’s capstone research and advanced study at Harvard Law School’s Program on Negotiation, I sought to demystify the neurological mechanisms that shape our behavior in conflict—particularly the amygdala hijack phenomenon. When individuals perceive threat, the brain’s survival system takes over, triggering fight, flight, or freeze responses that disconnect us from empathy, reasoning, and executive function. Left unaddressed, these physiological reactions often derail negotiations and deepen impasse.

Through both explanation and live demonstration, I introduced a series of practical “neural interventions” that mediators and facilitators can use to help disputants regain cognitive balance. Techniques such as grounding and mirroring, language pacing, somatic awareness, and cognitive reframing allow practitioners to re-engage the prefrontal cortex, restoring calm, curiosity, and the capacity for rational decision-making.

My goal in sharing this work is not simply to teach theory, but to empower mediators to recognize and respond to the human nervous system in real time—transforming volatile moments into opportunities for insight, resolution, and restored communication.

Skills: Neuroscience in Mediation · Emotional Regulation · Conflict Transformation · Mediation Strategy · Interest-Based Negotiation · Peacebuilding · Executive Function Coaching · Dispute Resolution · Conflict Management · Facilitation · Transformative Mediation · Strategic Negotiations · Professional Training & Development

Core Competencies:
Neuroscience of Conflict · Emotional Regulation in Mediation · Cognitive Reframing · Somatic Awareness and Mind-Body Integration · Advanced Facilitation Techniques · Conflict Transformation · Applied Psychology in Negotiation · Trauma-Informed Mediation Practice · Executive Function Coaching · Professional Training and Development

Strategic Settlement Design
Presented by Melissa Kinzler and Jeff Kichaven for MyLaw CLE

This advanced continuing legal education course, co-presented by Melissa Kinzler and her mentor Jeff Kichaven, a nationally recognized commercial mediator, offers attorneys a deep dive into the strategic and practical architecture of settlement negotiation. Designed for corporate counsel, litigators, and trial attorneys, the program bridges sophisticated negotiation theory with actionable practice, guiding participants through the art of designing settlements that endure.

Drawing on their combined decades of experience in high-stakes mediation, Kinzler and Kichaven illuminate how to craft settlement offers that go beyond numbers—addressing the underlying interests, motivations, and relational dynamics that determine long-term success. Participants explore how to integrate non-monetary value, build credibility with diverse stakeholders, and anticipate future points of contention before they arise.

The course also unpacks the unique challenges of multi-party negotiations, offering practical frameworks for managing complexity. Topics include coalition-building, sequencing proposals, and joint fact-finding—methods that enable mediators and counsel to align competing interests and sustain momentum toward agreement. Through case analysis and real-world examples, attendees learn how to create durable, enforceable settlements that withstand legal scrutiny and organizational change.

By the conclusion of the program, participants emerge with a refined toolkit of negotiation techniques drawn from leading-edge commercial mediation practice—empowering them to resolve complex disputes with precision, creativity, and foresight.

Audience: Corporate Attorneys · In-House Counsel · Litigators · Trial Attorneys

Skills: Settlement Negotiation · Multi-Party Mediation · Coalition Building · Dispute Systems Design · Strategic Negotiations · Commercial Mediation · Interest-Based Bargaining · Legal Strategy · Conflict Management

Core Competencies:
Strategic Settlement Design · Complex Negotiation Architecture · Multi-Party Mediation · Coalition Building · Dispute Systems Design · Interest-Based Bargaining · Commercial Mediation Strategy · Legal Analysis and Risk Management · Relationship and Trust Dynamics · Advanced Negotiation Practice

A deep dive into preparing high-conflict or subject-matter sensitive cases through the lens of emotional intelligence, using interest-based negotiation, diagnostic listening, and executive-function skills to help practitioners structure their preparation for maximum clarity, strategy, and client stabiliy.

This training - originally designed in partnership with Beekee Technology and JAMS-Weinstein International Foundation Fellow Victor Baba - was designed to teach 250,000 African stakeholders, leaders, civil society members and refugees how to manage international conflicts in their newly established homeland in North Kenya, equips leaders and mediators to interpret the silent signals that shape conflict long before words are spoken. Participants learn how posture, gaze, micro-expressions, timing, and somatic cues reveal interests, unspoken concerns, and emotional states. Rooted in PON’s communication architecture and Melissa’s attunement-based methodology, the course shows how to restore trust, de-escalate tension, and guide parties toward clarity—using the intelligence of what is not said.

A comprehensive training to certify law students, mediators and others in the necessary components to mediate in Superior Court in California. In ethical mediation practice, covering conflict theory, impartiality, communication tools, mediation stages, and party-centered negotiation. The training prepares mediators for court-connected work using principled negotiation, trauma-aware communication, cultural humility, and Melissa’s own approach to attuning to emotion without losing neutrality. DRPA (Dispute Resolution Programs Act) in California is a statewide initiative that funds and supports local community-based mediation programs to help courts divert appropriate cases out of litigation. It promotes accessible, low-cost conflict-resolution services — such as mediation, conciliation, and early intervention — to reduce court backlog and empower communities to resolve disputes collaboratively.

Melissa researched it first! Two years before legislation was passed beginning the regulation of mediators in California, Melissa wrote an 80 page research publication about the risks and benefits of growing regulatory landscape surrounding mediation … and the real-world risk-patterns emerging in the field — in this training she offers practitioners a structured, data-informed view of how to safeguard process integrity and professional practice.

A comparative analysis of distributive and integrative negotiation approaches, demonstrating how practitioners can shift from positional, high-conflict bargaining into value-creating, interest-based problem solving that preserves relationships while meeting core needs.

A sharp, ethics-driven analysis of the subtle missteps mediators make when procedural shortcuts, cognitive bias, or competitive arousal cloud professional judgment — and how to prevent these pitfalls using principled negotiation practices and rigorous dispute-system design standards.

A geopolitical conflict-mapping session examining the Russia–Ukraine war through negotiation theory, identity-based conflict frameworks, escalation cycles, and potential zones of agreement — helping audiences understand the conflict through a structured, analytical lens.

This training distills elite negotiation methodologies into practical tools for attorneys, executives, and leaders. Participants learn how experts structure preparation, identify interests, generate options, manage difficult tactics, and avoid cognitive traps. Melissa demonstrates how high-skill negotiation is less about brut power and more about data-gathering disciplined frameworks, relational intelligence, and strategic clarity.

A deep exploration of how emotional awareness drives better negotiation outcomes. This session blends systems-informed emotional regulation frameworks with principled negotiation tools to help professionals identify triggers, navigate reactivity, and anchor in executive function. The result: more ethical decisions, clearer communication, and durable agreements grounded in mutual respect and attunement.